Research Matters Blog

Canadian Observatory on Homelessness/Homeless Hub: York University
May 22, 2015
Tags: LGBTQ2
Categories: Ask the Hub

This question came from Matias C.L. via our latest website survey.

Queer and trans youth – who I will refer to as LGBTQ2 youth – are overrepresented among people experiencing homelessness.

Research from Ottawa, Ontario in 2000 found that anywhere between 25 and 40% of all youth experiencing homelessness identify as LGBTQ2. More recently, the 2012 Toronto Street Needs assessment asked participants staying in youth shelters about their LGBTQ2 identity for the first time and found that 1 in 5 youth experiencing homelessness identify as LGBTGQ2. Given these numbers, it’s crucial that we make shelters and transitional, supportive and affordable housing accessible for this population.

While youth in general have a variety of needs when it comes to housing, there must be extra considerations for those who identify as LGBTQ2. Many leave home due to lack of family/guardian acceptance, and find the same lack of support elsewhere. As Dr. I. Alex Ambramovich wrote in No Safe Place to Go:

“The threat of violence and harassment on the streets is exacerbated for LGBTQ youth due to frequent encounters with homophobia and transphobia. These threats make it especially hard for youth who were forced to leave home due to homophobia or transphobia because it makes coming out and trusting people more challenging. There are also countless situations where youth are victimized, ridiculed, and beaten up on the streets and in the shelter system simply for their gender and/or sexual identity. Regardless of their gender or sexual identity, homeless youth most often come from family situations of conflict, abuse, and neglect.”

While overt discrimination due to trans- and homophobia is a large issue for many LGBTS2 youth, there are also situations in which it is subtlety present or systemic, as in shelter systems. In the same report, Abramavich highlighted this as well: “Most shelters are segregated by birth sex, which increases the risk for gender discrimination and gender violence to occur within shelters. Shelter staff members tend to have minimal training around transgender-related issues, needs, and terminology.” It is estimated that 1 in 3 transgender youth, who experience more violence than any other group, are turned away from shelters based on their gender expression/identity.


Sprott HouseAbramavich recommended that homelessness support services (such as shelters) increase training re: LGBTQ2 issues, adopt harm reduction approaches to substance use, revise complaint systems to improve shelters, implement strict anti-homophobic and anti-transphobic language policies, and openly identify as a LGBTQ2 positive space. At the government level, Abroamavich recommends developing a specific strategy to address the homelessness of this group. Indeed, the city of Toronto Street Needs Assessment came to similar conclusions – with 54 beds specifically for LGBTQ2 youth included in the city’s 2015 budget. These beds will come in the form of Sprott House, pictured right – which will be the first specifically LGBTQ2 youth housing program in Canada. 

None of this, however, directly addresses how to make low-income or social housing more accessible. Unfortunately, as I wrote a few weeks ago, there has been little research on LGBTQ2 youth outside of their experiences within urban shelter systems. That said, I think many of the recommendations made by Abramavich and other researchers/advocates/community members can be applied to low income and social housing.

  • Training: Ensure that everyone involved (caseworkers, property managers, superintendents, etc.) receive explicitly anti homophobia and anti transphobia training; and learn about LGBTQ2 issues, experiences and terminology.

  • Community involvement: Give LGBTQ2 youth experiencing homelessness opportunities to share what would make housing more accessible and safer for them in your specific building, complex, or community. Encouraging involvement and meaningful participation (not just tokenism) can make services more effectively inclusive.

  • Reformed processes: Trans youth may have identification, documentation, and/or references that correspond with a different name, sex, and/or gender than what they currently identify as. Creating processes that are flexible and understanding of these changes is key to making any kind of housing more accessible. 

  • Integrated supports: Depending on age, circumstances and experience, LGBTQ2 youth will need a variety of supports (casework, financial assistance, education, life skills, counselling, family reunification, etc.) to help them secure and stay within housing. What is important here, as pointed out by Gaetz and others, is availability and choice - some LGBTQ2 youth will want completely independent living while others will want housing that is more deeply supportive.

Ultimately, as Gaetz et al. wrote in Youth Homelessness in Canada, moving to a homelessness prevention model is key to ending youth homelessness. In the meantime, however, we must make existing services more safe and accessible – especially for vulnerable groups like LGBTQ2 youth.

This post is part of our Friday "Ask the Hub" blog series. Have a homeless-related question you want answered? E-mail us at and we will provide a research-based answer.

Photo credit: Erica Lenti on Torontoist

York University; Canadian Observatory on Homelessness/Homeless Hub
May 20, 2015

This week’s infographic is from a Mother Jones article that looked at the success that the Housing First philosophy has been having in Utah. Housing First is an example of an alternative to status quo approaches to homelessness, combining immediate access to permanent housing with wrap-around supports. The presence of built-in supports, including health care and counseling services, as well as employment and education supports, are essential for the Housing First approach. There are several causes of homelessness and in order to become solutions, it makes sense that approaches towards solving homelessness also need to be multifaceted.

Osceola County, Florida, tracked 37 homeless people arrested 1,250 times over 10 years for 61,896 total days of incarceration.

Recent years have seen the increased criminalization of homelessness in the United States. The infographic states that 37 homeless people living in Osceola County, Florida, were arrested over 1,000 times over a ten year span, spending a cumulative 61,896 days in jail. It is estimated that the costs associated with arresting these individuals, charging them, and providing them with care in jail was well over six million dollars. Compared to the cost of providing support services to individuals living in homelessness, arresting and putting them into jail is prohibitively expensive.

However, we need not look all the way to the US for examples of laws that target individuals living in homelessness and waste financial resources. In 2000, the Ontario Safe Streets Act (SSA) came into effect. While the act was meant to address aggressive forms of solicitation, the way the law has been applied in real life is considerably different. A review of SSA tickets handed out by Toronto Police indicates that four out of five tickets were handed out for non-aggressive acts. This places increasing financial stress on individuals who, as it stands, have difficulty affording basic needs. Involvement with the criminal law system effectively acts as a barrier for many individuals seeking access to supports and services that can help them move out of homelessness. This includes educational supports, training opportunities for employment, housing subsidies, and food assistance. Fifteen years in, it's clear that the Act is an unproductive and discriminatory means of dealing with the province's growing homelessness problem.

The SSA provides a great example of how ineffective laws targeting homeless people are, compared to policies addressing affordable housing and other measures that actually address homelessness head-on. Criminality is not a synonym for the word homeless; we need to be doing a better job of supporting and enacting research-informed practices and policies. Strategies that look to address homelessness need to have a long-term focus and be informed by the experiences of people living in homelessness, rather than myths about homelessness. Spreading awareness has a vital role to play in informing the general public about real solutions to homelessness.

The SSA is a misinformed, inefficient, discriminatory piece of legislation that contributes to the criminalization of homelessness. It has no place in a province that possesses a social conscience and an interest in promoting the well-being of all of its citizens. I invite you to join the coalition to repeal the SSA. Criminalizing homelessness targets individuals living in homelessness, rather than homelessness itself.

Canadian Observatory on Homelessness/Homeless Hub: York University
May 15, 2015
Categories: Ask the Hub

This question came from Ashley L. via our latest website survey.

According to our latest report, of the over 235,000 Canadians who experience homelessness in a year, about 5000 people are unsheltered (living on the streets). It is reasonable to wonder, what with so many services available, why some unsheltered people would “choose” to remain so.

The reasons why people become homeless are multiple and complicated. Between individual/relational factors, structural factors, and systems failures, homelessness itself is generally not a choice – despite a pervasive myth that it always is. When thinking about homelessness as a choice it’s important to recognize what other options are available to people, and what their experiences have been. If homelessness is an option, and not something that happens out of necessity, what are the other options available?

James from Money Changes YouIt is important to recognize that for some people, being housed feels less safe than being homeless. Some may have experienced violence and/or sexual assault in their homes, and grew to feel trapped. Some lose jobs or live in poverty for a long time – without a strong social support system or an abundance of affordable housing, a person can become homeless during just one bout of unemployment. Some are currently experiencing violence and conflict and have nowhere else to go. For other people, being homeless gives them a sense of freedom. As James (pictured right), a participant experiencing homelessness in the film Money Changes You, said: 

“I’d rather be back on the street because I understand the street better than living indoors. Living outdoors you’re completely free. You’re independent and life is as you make it day by day by yourself and it’s more honest and honourable. Because once you’re indoors you start having all the syndromes of modern industrial society. Living indoors you go soft right away.”

Another factor is the shoddy state of some shelters, the primary response to homelessness in North America. Many are often overcrowded and understaffed. As Lauren Gostick, a frontline social worker, told NOW in January:

"The shelter systems in general are broken and they're old. You're thrown in with a large group of people who are all in an immediate, acute crisis situation. One person may have extreme mental health issues, another is dealing with substance abuse and somebody else is smoking crack in the bed across from you. It's survival of the fittest."

In other words, for people experiencing mental health issues and/or substance abuse, shelters can be even worse environments for them than the streets. Shelters often lack the services and skills needed to accommodate older adults, people with disabilities, and other marginalized people. For example, LGTBTQ2 youth are overrepresented in the homeless population, many of which are fleeing families where they are not accepted. When seeking shelter services, it’s estimated that 1 in 3 trans youth will be turned away.

Regardless of what other “options” people experiencing homelessness have, remaining unhoused is not an ideal choice – it is one people feel they have to make because it is the best option for them at the time. In the words of Christine Schanes: ”…one choice from two or more options is only a true choice when the consequences of the choices are equal or nearly equal. The choice between living in a home or living on the streets is an unequal choice because of their unequal consequences."

This post is part of our Friday "Ask the Hub" blog series. Have a homeless-related question you want answered? E-mail us at and we will provide a research-based answer.

Photo credit: Still from Money Changes You

York University; Canadian Observatory on Homelessness/Homeless Hub
May 13, 2015

The below infographic, published by the Greater Victoria Coalition to End Homelessness as part of their recent report, takes a look at pathways in and out of youth homelessness.

Pathways In & Out of Youth Homelessness in Greater Victoria

Pathways Into Youth Homelessness

The pathways into homelessness for youth are varied. A major push factor (mentioned in this infographic) is the violence and discrimination youth may be facing at home. A high number of LGBQT2 youth leave home for just this reason. Many of these youth relocate to major urban centers like Toronto in the hopes that they will be able to find the services and supports they need. Unfortunately, specialized services for homeless LGBQT2 youth, even in large cities like Toronto are few and far between.

Trauma is also a common experience for many youth before and after becoming homeless. If they find themselves living on the streets, youth are at increased risk of experiencing further trauma. Living on the streets is directly linked to increased risk of witnessing and being victims of physical and sexual violence. The longer a youth is homeless, the greater the likelihood of further physical and emotional harm. As a result, many youth turn to substance use (and abuse) as a coping mechanism to deal with stressors associated with living on the streets. Homelessnesss is an independent predictor of injection drug use among street-involved youth.

Finally, some youth may find themselves living in homelessness because of the high cost of rental housing. The cost of housing has spiked in recent years, and this rise in the cost of rent has not been accompanied by a similar growth in affordable housing.

Pathways Out of Youth Homelessness

Factors involved in the pathway to youth homelessness tend to be based on the unique circumstances faced by different individuals. Accordingly, we are unlikely to find one quick-stop solution, or support, that can put an end to youth homelessness, as this infographic indicates. When we consider the scope of the problem, it can be difficult to know where to start.

Fortunately, there has already been a great deal of research documenting what steps can be taken to help youth living in homelessness. For starters, it should be understood that youth living in homelessness have similar needs and goals as youth not living in homelessness. Accordingly, there should be a visible difference in how services and supports are designed and delivered for youth living in homelessness compared to adults living in homelessness. Providing specialized supports, tailored to the needs of youth, is a step in the right direction.

Preventing Youth Homelessness

Early interventions – not directly outlined in this infographic – should be considered when discussing pathways in and out of homelessness for youth. It can be understood as a preventative measure against chronic homelessness, and as a means to protect youth entering homeless from the serious dangers that come with living on the streets, before they get there. The current lack of early intervention programs for youth just entering homelessness has harmful implications for the long-term health and well being of these youth.

Factors like trauma and family breakdown have been identified as precursors to homelessness, but it is not necessary for these youth to become homeless in order for their needs to be addressed in these situations. Preventive approaches to youth homelessness have been undertaken in the United Kingdom and Australia to great effect. In some situations, these programs have looked to prevent breakdown in familial relationships. In others, where a youth may experience abuse and trauma in the home, these programs have looked to help transition young people into living situations that have built-in supports.

May 11, 2015
Categories: Topics

Addressing the mental health of people experiencing homelessness should be one of the priorities.Outreach is the first step in developing relationships with the most disenfranchised people in Canada. It links people who are homeless to resources and services they want and need. The goal of outreach is to provide the spark for the journey back to a vital and dignified life as part of the community. Core outreach services include engagement, information and referral and direct services. But even the best outreach efforts cannot be successful without following through and offering proper programs and services. 

Research raises concerns about the lack of access to necessary programs and services, long waiting times and the lack of specialized care for a variety of different conditions and target groups. People are often strong supporters of the programs they do access but express concerns abort how difficult it is to access care when it is needed, particularly in rural areas. Canadians express a need for better transitions and coordination across the range of services they require as well as better planning when discharged from formal facilities. 

There is always a need for better access to and a larger number of healthcare services for people experiencing mental illness. People experiencing mental illness need more services in hospitals, more beds in acute care hospitals and provincial facilities, more community based programs and services, more supports for people to be independent and employed in their communities, more outreach, outpatient and rehabilitation programs, more awareness programs, more housing with supports for people with mental illness, more coordination of services, more support for families, more crisis intervention and more mental healthcare providers.


Recent Tweets

Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License

The analysis and interpretations contained in the blog posts are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness.