Research Matters Blog
This infographic by Food Banks Canada was part of the HungerCount report. The report states that while there was a drop of approximately 40,000 food bank users between 2012 – 2013, there were 833,000 food bank users in Canada. This is 23% more than the number of people who accessed food banks prior to the 2008 recession. PROOF’s Household Food Insecurity in Canada 2012 report, stated that approximately 1.4 Million households experience food insecurity in Canada.
Programs that offer emergency food services vary in their makeup. A large majority of those in the HungerCount study (78%) offer non-traditional services. These services include:
- Food focused programs
- Skill building programs
- Social service programs
- Referral to other services
Some of the recommendations in this report are aimed at reducing future reliance on food banks in Canada. A few of the main recommendations include:
- Expanding benefits for Employment Insurance
- Increasing Social Assistance levels
- Reforms to ‘flexible’ labour laws that privilege employers
It is important to recognize that those facing food insecurity are also likely facing insecurity in other areas such as housing and employment. Those who are at risk of losing their housing may be unable to access good food without the support of emergency food services. Affordable housing, rent supplements and rent geared to income are also important in ensuring that lower paid workers are still able to access good, nutritious and culturally relevant food. Unfortunately with recent federal changes there will be 10,500 fewer social housing units funded. The HungerCount report also notes that 1.6M families currently spend over 30% of their income on housing.
Overall, it is important that we continue to look at the connection between poverty, food security and homelessness. Policy decisions at every jurisdictional level should address the current needs while implementing preventative measures that will decrease reliance on emergency services in the future.
Those who work in the homelessness sector are well aware that individuals are often discharged from hospitals and mental health facilities into homelessness. There are two main consequences to this. First, the mental health and well-being of such individuals is likely to worsen if discharged into homelessness rather than housing, and second, staff in emergency shelters and day programs are not well-equipped to provide necessary and appropriate supports for people in such situations.
Cheryl Forchuk is a leading researcher on transitions from psychiatric wards into homelessness, in terms of understanding both the consequences for individuals who experience this, and effective intervention models that ensure successful transitions to the community through housing and supports.
According to Forchuk, emergency shelters – even well run shelters – are “not appropriate places for recovery from mental illnesses”. Many of the problems we associate with shelters – lack of privacy, low resident/staff ratios, exposure to drugs and the sex trade, real or perceived threats to safety, being around others who are ill or who have mental health problems, and in some cases overcrowding – can exacerbate problems for psychiatric survivors. Unfortunately, this happens all too often. In their study of people discharged from psychiatric wards in London – a mid-sized Canadian city - they found that 167 of 1,588 (10.5%) individuals were discharged with no fixed address in a single year. Data from local emergency shelters showed the number to be even higher – 194. Structural factors contribute to this situation, including a trend towards shorter stays in hospital as an in-patient, and a dramatic reduction in the availability of affordable housing in most Canadian cities.
Research from Canada and the United States suggests that necessary reforms and interventions can dramatically reduce the risk of homelessness for those discharged from mental health facilities, with a resultant improvement in mental health and well-being. A randomized control trial by Herman and colleagues from 2011 demonstrates that Critical Time Interventions (CTI) upon discharge are designed to:
“prevent recurrent homelessness and other adverse outcomes following discharge in two ways: by strengthening the individual's long-term ties to services, family, and friends; and by providing emotional and practical support during the critical time of transition. An important aspect of CTI is that post-discharge services are delivered by a worker who has established a relationship with the client before discharge.”
- Assessment and immediate response to client need (it is argued that a determination of risk of homelessness should be made early, upon admittance);
- Goal planning and advocacy to coordinate supports;
- Assistance in finding affordable housing;
- A streamlined process (including fast tracking) so that individuals could receive government benefits to pay for first and last month’s rent.
The results of this study and others clearly demonstrate that targeted and relatively brief support has a substantial and lasting impact on the risk of becoming homeless for those discharged from mental health facilities.
In Alberta, the province is also piloting similar policies and protocols to reduce the likelihood that people are discharged from in-patient mental health care into homelessness. This work demonstrates that it is possible to implement more effective interventions that can contribute to thoughtful, respectful and effective responses to homelessness and the needs of mental health consumer survivors.
FROM: Gaetz, S. (2014). Coming of Age: Reimagining the Response to Youth Homelessness in Canada. Homeless Hub Research Report Series.
The Mental Health Commission of Canada just released the Final Report following their At Home/Chez Soi project. This multi-year demonstration project has shown some fabulous results and answers many of the questions we’ve had about Housing First.
Funded with $110 million by the Government of Canada, this research demonstration project encompassed four years and five cities. Each city also had a specific focus or sub-population. They were:
- Vancouver (people also experiencing problematic substance use),
- Winnipeg (urban Aboriginal population),
- Toronto (ethno-racialized populations, including new immigrants who do not speak English),
- Montréal (includes a vocational study),
- Moncton (services in small communities).
As the “Best Practice” in Housing First (HF), the report’s “Key Findings” section answers the question “Does Housing First Work?” with a resounding “YES!” We’re reproducing the key findings here with links to some other research that supports them. Be sure to read the full MHCC report for all the important details.
- “Housing First can be effectively implemented in Canadian cities of different size and different ethnoracial and cultural composition. Across all the five cities, HF programs were operated in a manner that was consistent with the HF model standards, but were tailored to best fit the local contexts. The HF approach was successfully adapted to serve Aboriginal, immigrant, and other ethnoracial groups in a culturally sensitive manner. (Chapter 2)”
- “Housing First rapidly ends homelessness. Across all cities, HF participants in At Home/Chez Soi rapidly obtained housing and retained their housing at a much higher rate than the treatment as usual (TAU) group. (Chapter 4)”
- “Housing First is a sound investment. The economic analysis found some cost savings and cost offsets. (Chapter 5)”
- “It is Housing First, but not Housing Only. The support and treatment services offered by the HF programs contributed to appropriate shifts away from many types of crisis, acute, and institutional services towards more consistent community and outreach-based services. This shift supports and encourages more appropriate use of health and shelter services. (Chapter 5)”
- “Having a place to live and the right supports can lead to other positive outcomes above and beyond those provided by existing services. HF participants also demonstrated somewhat better quality of life and community functioning outcomes than those receiving existing housing and health services in each city. (Chapter 6)”
- “There are many ways in which Housing First can change lives. The HF groups, on average, improved more and described fewer negative experiences that TAU (Chapter 6). Understanding the reasons for differences of this kind will help to tailor future approaches, including understanding the small group for whom HF did not result in stable housing. (Chapter 4)”
- “Getting Housing First right is essential to optimizing outcomes. Housing stability, quality of life, and community functioning outcomes were all more positive for programs that operated most closely to Pathways HF standards. (Chapter 6)”
Overall, it was found that Housing First is good for a variety of populations, in a variety of places and can be used in programs of different sizes. Most importantly, this report provides detailed evidence that Housing First works.
For more on Housing First check out the Homeless Hub’s book “Housing First in Canada: Supporting Communities to End Homelessness”. Also, on April 22nd we will be launching our newest report “A Safe and Decent Place to Live: Towards a Housing First Framework for Youth” which examines how communities can implement a youth-specific HF approach. Author, Dr. Stephen Gaetz will introduce the report in a free webinar on April 22nd at 12PM (EDT). Everyone is welcome to participate. Sign up for the event.
Goering, P., Veldhuizen, S., Watson, A., Adair, C., Kopp, B., Latimer, E., Nelson, G., MacNaughton, E., Streiner, D., Aubry, T. (2014). National At Home/Chez Soi Final Report. Calgary, AB: Mental Health Commission of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca
This post is part of our Friday "Ask the Hub" blog series. Have a homeless-related question you want answered? E-mail us at email@example.com and we will provide a research-based answer.
Yesterday the national final report for the cross-site At Home/Chez Soi project was released. The project’s $110M budget was funded by Health Canada. The At Home/Chez Soi project utilized the Housing First model, which draws on the ‘Pathways to Housing program’ from New York City.
Tracking a group of people who received the Housing First intervention, and a group of people who didn’t, allowed for what I believe to be the largest scale tracking of a homelessness intervention in Canada. The results showed that in all of the scenarios, people who had been experiencing homelessness were more likely to remain sheltered and less likely to access emergency healthcare services. Overall, throughout the course of this trial, it has shown that Housing First is cost efficient, effective and a humane solution to homelessness in Canada. This demonstration is key in moving forward to end homelessness with evidence-based practice. Nick Falvo previously highlighted some of the other significant points about Housing First, including that it will provide a base of raw data that will be available for years to come. The information is bitter sweet, however, in that the federal budget for homelessness intervention is at 35% of the level it was in 1999.
The seven main messages and key findings identified in the report are as follows:
1) Housing First works in different sized cities with different ethnoracial and cultural compositions.
2) Housing First rapidly ends homelessness.
3) Housing First is a sound investment.
4) Housing First is not housing only.
5) Having a place to live with supports can lead to positive outcomes outside of those provided in the services.
6) Housing First can change lives in many different ways.
7) Correctly designing Housing First programs is important to getting the best outcomes.
Images taken from the National At Home/Chez Soi Final Report produced by the Mental Health Commission of Canada.
On Tuesday, April 8, results of the Mental Health Commission of Canada‘s At Home/Chez Soi homelessness study will be released at an Ottawa press conference. The study followed more than 2,000 participants in five Canadian cities. All were homeless when the study began. Half of them received the Housing First intervention, and half of them did not. Data was collected from 2009 until 2013.
Here are 10 things you should know about this study.
- It is one of the most ambitious randomized controlled trials in Canadian history.
- Its $110 million budget was funded entirely by Health Canada.
- The decision to fund it was made by the Harper government.
- At least 30 separate studies will roll out of this project. More than a dozen have already been released.
- For years to come, many researchers will be able to access raw data from the study for further analysis.
- The results are being announced in a context of declining federal funding for homelessness. (After adjusting for inflation, annual federal funding for homelessness in 2014 represents just 35% of its 1999 level.)
- As the study is being released, use of emergency shelters in Canada’s largest city has been on the rise.
- The report is being released amid some evidence that Toronto shelter conditions have been worsening.
- Canada’s Minister of State for Social Development is scheduled to attend the release of the study’s findings.
- The “intervention” being studied (namely, the Housing First approach to homelessness) was explicitly endorsed in last October’s federal throne speech.
Reprinted with permission from The Progressive Economics Forum.
Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License